Kısım 15 · Bölüm 60
Ari'nin Metni
Yapay zekâ çevirisi
Henüz Türkçe dilinde yok — gösterilen: English
- *With this you will understand the secret of the Nesira, which gives her the Dinim, which are the Achoraim. For at first, he had the externality called Achor, which is the smallness. And understand this — the intermediate is not called Achoraim, and he had Achor and intermediate. And when the face comes, which is the greatness, then what was Malchut, in the secret of Ibur alone, a single vessel in the back (he grew her from his back into a complete Partzuf, up to opposite the chest, which is half his measure; and behold, she is completed like him, although she is half his measure, and she is still lacking Yesod and Malchut — and this is because she is not yet complete like him, but only half of him, like the time of his suckling; and the third inner vessel is lacking from her), for at the time that he has Ibur, she has no measure at all, only the Atara of the Yesod, which is half the measure within her; and now she grew (like his Yesod) like him.
İç Işık
Yapay zekâ çevirisi
Henüz Türkçe dilinde yok — gösterilen: English
Sorular ve Cevaplar
Henüz Türkçe dilinde yok — gösterilen: English
Sorular yükleniyor…
Bu şerh henüz tek tek maddelerle eşleştirilmedi — öğeler okuma sırasıyla gösteriliyor ve her birinin yanındaki numara, Ari'nin metnindeki maddeleri değil, notların kendisini sayar.
Bir maddeyle eşleştirilmedi
And this is what he says, “the posterior is the Katnut.” The meaning is that even though we call the Partzuf of the Nukva that precedes the sawing by the name Partzuf of the posterior, one must not err and think that the intention is to the external Partzuf alone, which is the Partzuf of Ibur; rather the intention is to the two Partzufim, Ibur and nursing, together. And they are called posterior because they are the discernment of Katnut, and any Katnut may be called posterior. However, the essential name posterior applies only to the Partzuf of Ibur, which is from the discernment of the Chazeh [chest] and below of the Partzuf as a whole, for all NHY are called posterior. And this is because they were not in the vessels of ZA at the time of the emergence of the kings of Nekudim; rather afterwards, through the illumination of the Vav and the point from the Yesod of AK, the vessels of NHY were joined to the ZAT of Nekudim. For therefore these seven kings expanded down to BYA, since they attained their NHY, which had been diminished and had fallen to the discernment of BYA through the second restriction of AK, as is written in the previous parts. And therefore these seven kings, which are only the discernment of the vessels of HBD HGT up to the Chazeh, are regarded as the anterior vessels; and only the discernment of the vessels of NHY that were joined to the kings from BYA are what are called the posterior vessels. Thus only the Partzuf of Ibur, which is the discernment of NHY, may be called posterior; but the Partzuf of HGT, which is always above the Chazeh, and which from its root in Nekudim was the discernment of Atzilut above the Parsa, cannot be called by the name posterior.
And this is what he says, “the intermediate is not called posterior,” namely as explained, for the intermediate, which is the Partzuf of HGT, is entirely anterior, since only from the Chazeh and below, which are the vessels of NHY, are posterior. And this is what he sets right beforehand, that the posterior is Katnut; for here, with the Nukva, they are the two Partzufim of Katnut, as is written further on, and both of them are called with her by the name posterior. For only in ZA is the Partzuf of HGT to be discerned as the discernment of anterior, as above; but in the Nukva her HGT too is regarded as being posterior. For at the time of the emergence of the seven kings, the Nukva, who is the seventh king, did not emerge there except in the discernment of the point of Keter alone, which is the point of the Chazeh, which from the side of the lights is regarded as the point of the Yesod (as above on page 1690, the passage beginning “And a point”). See there. And so all nine of her lower Sefirot are the discernment of posterior, for all of them came and were joined to her from the discernment of BYA at the time of the Gadlut of the kings. And it turns out that at that time there was in the discernment of Atzilut, namely above the Parsa, only her point of Keter alone; and therefore her Partzuf of HGT too is called by the name posterior. However, it is the way of the ARI to call every discernment of VAK by the name posterior, even in ZA.