Часть 12 · Глава 276
Текст АРИ
Перевод ИИ
Пока нет на языке Русский — показано: English
- And behold, afterward these Mochin grow more, and it is that these Names of Elokim are filled in the secret of their fillings. And the distinction and difference that there is between one and the other is that the Elokim of Hochma has its filling with Yuds, and that of Bina with Heis, and that of Daat with Alephs. And the mnemonic is YH'A (Yud, Hei, Aleph). As explained by us in the intention of 'Amen, may His great Name be blessed', etc. It thus follows that also in their fillings, all the difference and distinction is only recognizable in the Hei of Elokim. (And it seems to me, Chayim, that this too is in the manner stated above, in the form of the simple Elokim, for the reason is to indicate that only the Mochin of Bina was repaired.)
Ор пними
Перевод ИИ
Пока нет на языке Русский — показано: English
Внутреннее созерцание, вопросы и ответы
Пока нет на языке Русский — показано: English
Загрузка «Внутреннего созерцания»…
Этот комментарий ещё не сопоставлен с отдельными пунктами — примечания идут в порядке чтения, и номер рядом с каждым считает сами примечания, а не пункты текста АРИ.
Не сопоставлено с пунктом
And here one must remember what was explained regarding the three fillings YH’A, above (page 463, answer 1): that the filling with Yuds hints at the drawings that are from before the second restriction, and they come in the Partzufim AB and SAG of Atzilut, which receive from the discernment corresponding to them from AB and SAG of AK. Except from the Tabur downward of SAG, which receives from the discernment corresponding to it in SAG of AK from the Tabur downward, where the second restriction was already rooted in GAR of Nekudim that clothe there, and therefore the Vav of the Partzuf SAG of Atzilut is already in the filling of Aleph, like this: Vav-Aleph-Vav. But the Yod-Hey of SAG and the whole HaVaYaH of AB are in the filling of Yuds. Study it there well. And I shall not elaborate.
And therefore the discernment of HBD of Bina, which are the Yod-Hey that are in her until the Chazeh [chest], are in the filling of Yuds, since she receives from above the Tabur of Bina of AK, which is SAG of AK, which is the secret of AHYH of Yuds, whose gematria is 161. And the discernment of HGT of Bina is in the filling of Alephs, for she already receives from the Tabur downward of SAG of AK, where the second restriction of the rise of the bottom Hey to the Einayim is rooted, hinted at by the filling of Aleph. And the discernment of NHY of Bina is in the filling of Heis, which indicates that there is still no coupling in her, because of the lack of coarseness that is in her, for she has no coarseness except the discernment of the coarseness of the root, which is not fit for coupling, and she receives from a degree above her. Study it there well.
However, here, when speaking of the discernment of the Yod-Hey of the Mochin, where even in Bina, namely in the Yod-Hey of SAG, there is still no revelation of the discernment of Alephs, as above — therefore Elokim of Hochma is in the filling of Yuds, which is the Yud of the Mochin. And Elokim of Bina, which is the Hei of the Mochin, since she is still in the discernment of the posterior over Hochma — for although these fillings are revealed in ZA only in the second Ibur [impregnation], nevertheless in the first Ibur the state of AVI is still back to face, and this whole coupling of Gadlut that is revealed in him is only in the discernment of Hassadim covered in the posterior of Ima — therefore there is no coupling in the discernment of Bina of the Mochin with Hochma, and therefore she has no filling of Yuds, but only a filling of Heis, which indicates the external vessels, in which there is still no coupling.
And the discernment of the filling of Alephs, the beginning of its revelation here, is only in the Mochin of Daat, which is the discernment of HGT of the Mochin, drawn from the Chazeh downward of Bina, where the discernment of the second restriction is already rooted, as above.
And this is what it says, “It thus follows that also in their fillings, all the difference and distinction is only recognizable in the Hei of Elokim” — for these fillings that change in Yod-Hey-Aleph are only in the Hei of Elokim, but in the other four letters this change does not apply to them at all, for the fillings of the Aleph, Lamed, Yud, Mem are fixed without change. It thus follows that Elokim of Gadlut, which is with fillings, is equal in matter to Elokim of Katnut, which is without fillings, for both this and that have no distinction between the three Mochin except in the Hei of Elokim alone. But in Katnut, while the bottom Hey is still in the Einayim and is not yet fit for coupling, the fillings of Elokim are not mentioned there. For the filling is the coarseness that clarifies the level of the degree by way of the coupling with the direct light, and since there is no coupling there, the coarseness does not come up in the name. And the matter of the existence of the coarseness when it is alone, without coupling, is expressed only in the form alone, that on the side of Hochma the Hei of Elokim is imprinted with Dalet-Yud, and on the side of Bina with Dalet-Vav, and on the side of Daat with three Vavs, as above in item 273, etc. But in Gadlut, namely after the second Ibur, which is after the two years of nursing, when the bottom Hey descends from the Einayim to the Peh [mouth], there is already a coupling there upon the fillings. And the existence of the coarseness on the side of Hochma, which was then imprinted with Dalet-Yud, now showed its action in the coupling, and therefore the letters of Elokim were filled in the discernment of Yuds: Aleph-Lamed-Peh, Lamed-Mem-Dalet, Hei-Yud, Yud-Vav-Dalet, Mem-Mem. And the existence of the coarseness on the side of Bina, which was in the form Dalet-Vav, is now revealed in Elokim of Heis alone, which indicates the discernment of the posterior of Bina, which still rules and does not couple with Hochma, being in the secret of the state of face to back, as above. It thus follows that the coarseness of Bina has still not shown its action now. And the coarseness on the side of Daat, which is three Vavs, whose meaning is the illumination of the five Gevurot of Ima in the coarseness of phase one, has now shown its action, and the letters of Elokim were filled with the filling of Alephs, which is the whole discernment of the Gadlut of the vessels. For its form shows the joining of the lower waters, which are AHP, and the lower Yud in the form of Aleph, together with the upper waters, which are GE, and the upper Yud that is in the form of the Aleph, as above, page 463, answer 1 — study it there well.
However, they are still in the names of Elokim and not in the names of Havayot, and this is because of Bina, who is still in the state of face to back with Hochma, for this second Ibur is drawn by way of the raising of MAN from the posterior of AVI of the second division of Nekudim, which suffices only to raise the fallen AHP of AVI and return them to the Rosh [head], but not to return them face to face, as above (page 1213, the passage beginning “And therefore” — study it there well). And therefore Bina bestows upon ZA from this coupling only the discernment of Hassadim covered from her own degree, and not from the illumination of Hochma; only that they are now the discernment of the Hassadim of GAR, since Ima has already returned to the Rosh, and therefore ZA attains GAR of Ruach, as above. And therefore there is still no actual discernment of Gadlut of the Mochin here, which are the discernments of Havayot, but they are still in the discernment of Katnut and the names of Elokim, only that the letters of Elokim have been filled, since they are in the secret of the coupling of the wholeness of the Ruach.
And you see that there is still no revelation at all here for the Mochin of Hochma, because of the state of face to back that is in HB, and there is no wholeness here except on the side of Bina alone, whose Hassadim that she now bestows upon ZA are in complete Gadlut, after she has already attained her AHP, as above. And therefore, even now, there is no distinction between one Mochin and another except in the Hei of Elokim, which is the discernment of Bina, and not in the Yud of Elokim, which is the discernment of Hochma, for Bina receives no illumination at all from it in order to bestow upon ZA. In such a way that the Mochin of Hochma, on the side of its own existence in itself, is even now in utmost wholeness, for the existence of the coarseness of Dalet-Yud in the form of the Hei of Elokim has already shown its action, and the letters of Elokim have been filled in the discernment of Yuds, as above. But nonetheless ZA derives no enjoyment from this at all, because of the posterior of Bina that covers over Hochma. And understand well.