Partie 13 · Chapitre 190

Le texte du Ari

Pas encore disponible en Français — affichage : English

Thus it is found that the upper three [Sefirot] of Arich Anpin sit one upon the other: Keter, and beneath it Hochma, and beneath it Bina. And they are not in the manner of lines: Keter above, and Hochma and Bina below, on the two sides of the Keter. And the essence of this correction is to be in the manner of lines, as mentioned in many places above.

Lumière intérieure

Pas encore disponible en Français — affichage : English

Ce commentaire n'a pas encore été rattaché aux paragraphes individuels — les éléments sont affichés dans l'ordre de lecture, et le numéro à côté de chacun compte les notes elles-mêmes, et non les paragraphes du texte du Ari.

Non rattaché à un paragraphe

1 GAR [first three] of Arich Anpin sit one upon the other: Keter, and beneath it Hochma, and beneath it Bina; and they are not in the secret of lines: And seemingly this contradicts what was said above, that since Galgalta and Mocha Stimaa clothe the Hesed and Gevura of Atik, therefore they emerge as one, like AVI that is drawn from them, for Keter and Mocha Stimaa are opposite one another, and not one beneath the other. Study it there well. However, the matter of emerging as one, and their level being equal, which is stated even regarding AVI, does not mean that their level is literally equal to one another, for it is known that the Keter of Aba is higher than the level of Ima, and Ima does not reach the Keter of Aba, as the ARI writes below — so how are they of equal level? Rather, the explanation is mainly that they emerge as one, meaning that they are not emanated one from the other, but rather both of them are emanated at once from the one above them, for they are the discernment of the two records of male and female that always rise together to the upper Peh [mouth] and are included there, in the coupling of the upper one, the male being the discernment of the record of clothing, and the female being the discernment of the record of coarseness, as stated above in the words of the ARI at the beginning of Part 5, regarding the male and female of AB of Adam Kadmon, which is the secret of Yod-Hey of the vessel of Keter. Study it there well.
And from this discernment, Galgalta and Mocha Stimaa are regarded as also emerging as one from the mouth of the head of Atik, and are not emanated one from the other, and therefore they clothe the Hesed and Gevura of Atik at an equal level. However, certainly Galgalta is higher than Mocha Stimaa, and likewise Aba is higher than Ima, even though both of them come out from one level of the Bina of MA. However, what the ARI says here, that they are the discernment of one line, one below the other, is an entirely different matter, and it is as stated above, that Hochma and Bina do not stand in the Rosh of Arich Anpin on the right and left, as in AVI and ZON, for Bina is not regarded as the Nukva of the Mocha Stimaa, that it should illuminate her with the light of the Hochma that is in it, because the Hochma in it is corrected in the secret of Izka Rabba, and therefore the Bina went out from the Rosh [head], and there is nothing in the Rosh but one line, one below the other. And likewise from this discernment, Galgalta too is regarded as in the secret of Izka Dachya and the discernment of Mem of Tzelem, and it does not bestow from its Name of HaVaYaH of AB to the Mocha Stimaa, as above, and therefore it is above the Mocha Stimaa, for it does not come with her into coupling, and this too is in the discernment of one line. However, from the discernment of the Name of HaVaYaH of SAG, which is Lamed of Tzelem, they bestow one upon the other, and from this discernment they are not regarded as one line, but rather Galgalta and Mocha Stimaa are male and female, and the Daat of Radla [the unknown head] shows its light between them, as above in the words of the ARI. And remember this discernment, between the Hochma bestowed through the air, which is regarded only as the Bina of Hochma, which is not the discernment of the Rosh of Arich Anpin itself, and the Hochma of AB, which is the Hochma of Arich Anpin itself. And when the discussion is from the discernment of the Hochma of Arich Anpin itself, they are regarded as one line, and it is regarded that there is no bestowal from it in Atzilut whatsoever, and similarly for the rest of these expressions. However, when the discussion is from the discernment of the Hochma that illuminates in the air, which is the discernment of the Bina of Hochma, as above, it is found to be exactly the opposite — that there is no illumination in Atzilut except from there. And remember.

Pas encore disponible en Français — affichage : English