Перейти до текстуПерейти до тексту

Частина 16 · Глава 212

Текст АРІ

Переклад ШІ

Поки немає мовою Українська — показано: English

  1. And let us explain the difference between them. And the matter is that AA of Atzilut is a complete Partzuf in all its ten Sefirot, as is known. But AA of Beriah does not have complete ten Sefirot, only VAK alone, and it has no complete Partzuf. For since there is a screen between Atzilut and Beriah, the head of its AA is missing from Beriah, for it could not be clothed there in Beriah.

Ор пнімі

Переклад ШІ

Поки немає мовою Українська — показано: English

Цей коментар ще не зіставлено з окремими пунктами — примітки йдуть у порядку читання, а номер поруч із кожною рахує самі примітки, а не пункти тексту АРІ.

Не зіставлено з пунктом

  1. 1AA of Beria does not have complete ten Sefirot, only VAK alone, for since there is a screen between Atzilut and Beria, the Rosh [head] of its AA is missing from Beria. The Rosh of AA is AB, and from the throat downward AVI clothe it with the level of SAG, as above. And since the five Partzufim of Beria came out on the screen of phase two, of the discernment of a complete screen that conceals and covers over Hochma, as above in item 200, and in the Inner Light there, therefore the level of AA that came out through this screen lacks his GAR, which is the level of Hochma, and he has only from the discernment of his throat downward, where the level of SAG is. And it follows that the discernment of AA himself is the discernment of VAK lacking a Rosh. And below it will be explained that since AVI did not draw the level of SAG in their place from the throat of AA downward, but descended from the Chazeh [chest] downward, there remains in AA of Beria only TNHY alone. And see in the item below, page 2007, the passage beginning “AA.”

Запитання та відповіді

Поки немає мовою Українська — показано: English

Завантаження запитань…